M. Aitken, Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature, Energy Policy, vol.38, issue.4, pp.1834-1841, 2010.

D. Bell, T. Gray, and C. Haggett, The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: explanations and policy responses, Environmental politics, vol.14, issue.4, pp.460-477, 2005.

D. Bell, T. Gray, C. Haggett, S. Et, and J. , Re-visiting the 'social gap': public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy, Environmental Politics, vol.22, issue.1, pp.115-135, 2013.

V. Bertsch, M. Hyland, and M. Mahony, What drives people's opinions of electricity infrastructure? Empirical evidence from Ireland, Energy Policy, vol.106, pp.472-497, 2017.

J. E. Beuret, « La confiance est-elle négociable ? La construction d'un intérêt général territorialisé pour l'acceptation des parcs éoliens offshore de Saint Brieuc et Saint Nazaire, Géographie, économie, société, vol.18, pp.335-358, 2016.

D. Bidwell, The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy, Energy Policy, vol.58, pp.189-199, 2013.

S. Bourdin, F. Nadou, and F. Raulin, « Les collectivités locales comme acteurs intermédiaires de la territorialisation de la transition énergétique : l'exemple de la methanisation, vol.21, pp.273-293, 2019.

S. Bourdin, M. Colas, and F. Raulin, Understanding the problems of biogas production deployment in different regions: territorial governance matters too, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02409280

. Bourdin-s.;-nadou-s, The role of a local authority as a stakeholder encouraging the development of biogas: a study on territorial intermediation, Journal of Environmental Management, vol.58, 2020.

. Bridge-g, The map is not the territory: A sympathetic critique of energy research's spatial turn, Energy Research & Social Science, vol.36, pp.11-20, 2018.

J. T. Brinkman and R. F. Hirsh, Please in My Backyard" phenomenon: the culture of the machine in the rural American Midwest, Technology and culture, vol.58, issue.2, pp.335-367, 2017.

K. Burningham, Using the language of NIMBY: a topic for research, not an activity for researchers, Local environment, vol.5, issue.1, pp.55-67, 2000.

K. Burningham, J. Barnett, and G. Walker, An array of deficits: unpacking NIMBY discourses in wind energy developers' conceptualizations of their local opponents, Society & Natural Resources, vol.28, issue.3, pp.246-260, 2015.

F. Goedkoop and P. Devine-wright, Partnership or placation? The role of trust and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects, Energy Research & Social Science, vol.17, pp.135-146, 2016.

Y. Jean and L. Rieutord, Les espaces ruraux en France, Capes/Agrégation Histoire-Géographie, 2018.

T. Kortsch, J. Hildebrand, and P. Schweizer-ries, Acceptance of biomass plants-Results of a longitudinal study in the bioenergy-region Altmark, Renewable energy, vol.83, pp.690-697, 2015.

P. Lejoux and N. Ortar, « La transition énergétique : vrais enjeux, faux départs ?, SHS Web of Conferences, vol.9, 2014.

C. Mouat, C. Legacy, and A. March, The problem is the solution: Testing agonistic theory's potential to recast intractable planning disputes, Urban Policy and Research, vol.31, issue.2, pp.150-166, 2013.

A. Oiry, Conflits et stratégies d'acceptabilité sociale autour des énergies marines renouvelables sur le littoral français, vol.15, 2015.

M. J. Pasqualetti, Opposing wind energy landscapes: a search for common cause, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol.101, issue.4, pp.907-917, 2011.

Y. Pepermans and I. Loots, Wind farm struggles in Flanders fields: A sociological perspective, Energy Policy, vol.59, pp.321-328, 2013.

G. Perlaviciute, L. Steg, N. Contzen, S. Roeser, and N. Huijts, Emotional responses to energy projects: Insights for responsible decision making in a sustainable energy transition, Sustainability, vol.10, issue.7, 2018.

K. Schumacher and F. Schultmann, Local acceptance of biogas plants: a comparative study in the Trinational Upper Rhine Region, Waste and biomass valorization, vol.8, pp.2393-2412, 2017.

L. Sebastien, Vive la résistance éclairée : le cas de l'opposition à un projet de décharge, Sociologies pratiques, vol.2, pp.145-165, 2013.

L. Sebastien, « L'attachement au lieu, vecteur de mobilisation collective ? Étude de cinq territoires ruraux, Norois, pp.23-41, 2016.

L. Sebastien, « Résistance aux grands projets et émergence d'un capital politique, le cas des déchets. », L'Espace Politique, vol.34, 2001.

M. Soland, N. Steimer, and G. Walter, Local acceptance of existing biogas plants in Switzerland, Energy Policy, vol.61, pp.802-810, 2013.

J. Sowers, Fields of opportunity: Wind machines return to the plains, Great Plains Quarterly, vol.26, pp.99-112, 2006.

P. Subra, À quoi et à qui sert le débat public ? », Hérodote, n°110, pp.149-170, 2003.

D. Süsser, M. Döring, R. Et, and B. M. , Harvesting energy: Place and local entrepreneurship in community-based renewable energy transition, Energy Policy, vol.101, pp.332-341, 2017.

D. Toke, Wind power in UK and Denmark: can rational choice help explain diff erent outcomes?, Environmental Politics, vol.11, pp.83-100, 2002.

A. Torre, Conflits environnementaux et territoires, Développement Durable et Territoire, illeneuve-d Ascq, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01197943

A. Torre, O. Aznar, M. Bonin, A. Caron, . Chia-;-e et al., Conflits et tensions autour des usages de l'espace dans les territoires ruraux et périurbains. Le cas de six zones géographiques françaises, vol.3, pp.415-453, 2006.

A. Torre and J. E. Beuret, Proximités territoriales, 2012.

P. Upham and S. Shackley, The case of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: Implications for governance of renewable energy planning, Energy Policy, vol.34, issue.15, pp.2161-2172, 2006.

P. Upham and S. Shackley, 5MW(e) biomass gasifier in Devon: Questionnaire survey results, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol.31, issue.6, pp.433-441, 2007.

B. R. Upreti, . Van-der, and D. Horst, National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant, Biomass and bioenergy, vol.26, issue.1, pp.61-69, 2004.

G. Walker, P. Devine-wright, S. Hunter, H. High, and B. Evans, Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy, Energy Policy, vol.38, issue.6, pp.2655-2663, 2010.

C. R. Warren and M. Mcfadyen, Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland, Land use policy, vol.27, pp.204-213, 2010.

A. Wellinger, J. D. Murphy, and D. Baxter, The Biogas Handbook: science, production and applications, 2013.

M. Wolsink, Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support, Renewable energy, vol.21, issue.1, pp.49-64, 2000.

M. Wolsink, Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decisionmaking on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation, Energy policy, vol.35, issue.5, pp.2692-2704, 2007.

M. C. Zelem, « Les énergies renouvelables en transition: de leur acceptabilité sociale à leur faisabilité sociotechnique, 2012.

K. H. Zemo, T. E. Panduro, and M. Termansen, Impact of biogas plants on rural residential property values and implications for local acceptance, Energy policy, vol.129, pp.1121-1131, 2019.

J. Zoellner, P. Schweizer-ries, W. Et, and C. , Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany, Energy policy, vol.36, issue.11, pp.4136-4141, 2008.

, Annexe : Tableau. Liste des interviewés, vol.1