Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

In-vitro comparison between three types of acrylic glue (Glubran 2®, Histoacryl® and Purefill®) at two different ratios and different temperatures of use: what is the most relevant for clinical application?

Audrey Fohlen 1, 2 A Dencausse Samuel Valable 1 C Rebic J.P. Pelage 1, 2 Bernaudin Myriam 1 
1 ISTCT - Imagerie et Stratégies Thérapeutiques des pathologies Cérébrales et Tumorales
2 Service de Radiologie [CHU Caen]
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata
https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02384307
Contributor : Florence Couteau Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, November 28, 2019 - 11:57:19 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, November 3, 2021 - 7:21:41 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02384307, version 1

Collections

CEA | CNRS | COMUE-NORMANDIE | UNICAEN | ISTCT

Citation

Audrey Fohlen, A Dencausse, Samuel Valable, C Rebic, J.P. Pelage, et al.. In-vitro comparison between three types of acrylic glue (Glubran 2®, Histoacryl® and Purefill®) at two different ratios and different temperatures of use: what is the most relevant for clinical application?. Global Embolization Symposium and Technologies (GEST Asia 2016), Dec 2016, Tokyo, Japan. ⟨hal-02384307⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote Datacite

Share

Metrics

Record views

22