In-vitro comparison between three types of acrylic glue (Glubran 2®, Histoacryl® and Purefill®) at two different ratios and different temperatures of use: what is the most relevant for clinical application?

Audrey Fohlen; A Dencausse; Samuel Valable; C Rebic; J.P. Pelage; Bernaudin Myriam

Conference papers

In-vitro comparison between three types of acrylic glue (Glubran 2®, Histoacryl® and Purefill®) at two different ratios and different temperatures of use: what is the most relevant for clinical application?

Audrey Fohlen ^{1, 2} A Dencausse Samuel Valable ¹ C Rebic J.P. Pelage ^{1, 2} Bernaudin Myriam ¹

1 ISTCT - Imagerie et Stratégies Thérapeutiques des pathologies Cérébrales et Tumorales

2 Service de Radiologie [CHU Caen]

Document type :

Conference papers

Domain :

Life Sciences [q-bio]

Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02384307
Contributor : Florence Couteau <>
Submitted on : Thursday, November 28, 2019 - 11:57:19 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, September 2, 2020 - 1:26:03 PM

In-vitro comparison between three types of acrylic glue (Glubran 2®, Histoacryl® and Purefill®) at two different ratios and different temperatures of use: what is the most relevant for clinical application?

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Export

Metrics

24

In-vitro comparison between three types of acrylic glue (Glubran 2®, Histoacryl® and Purefill®) at two different ratios and different temperatures of use: what is the most relevant for clinical application?

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Export

Share

Metrics

24