Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Anaphore associative et anaphore possessive : quelles différences pour les relations de cohérence ?

Abstract : This paper is devoted to associative anaphora and possessive anaphora with two kinds of nouns. One is meronyms, where a noun denotes a concept that is a part of another as in trunk/tree. The other is what I call “functionally localized” nouns, such as church with respect to village, where the latter denotes a concept that normally implies the existence of the concept denoted by the former : see Kleiber (2001). We first evoke the referential properties of these two kinds of anaphora. The properties of the possessive determiner are then discussed in order to explain its occasional incompatibility with meronyms or functionally localized nouns. Finally, we elucidate the consequences for the choice between associative and possessive anaphora upon textual coherence relations, in particular Claim-Evidence (Cornish, 2009a, b) and Explanation.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02143804
Contributor : Mathilde Salles <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, May 29, 2019 - 3:51:32 PM
Last modification on : Monday, July 22, 2019 - 10:11:33 AM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Mathilde Salles. Anaphore associative et anaphore possessive : quelles différences pour les relations de cohérence ?. Revue Romane, John Benjamins Publishing, 2013, 48 (1), pp.51-78. ⟨10.1075/rro.48.1.03sal⟩. ⟨hal-02143804⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

55