Anaphore associative et anaphore possessive : quelles différences pour les relations de cohérence ?

Abstract : This paper is devoted to associative anaphora and possessive anaphora with two kinds of nouns. One is meronyms, where a noun denotes a concept that is a part of another as in trunk/tree. The other is what I call “functionally localized” nouns, such as church with respect to village, where the latter denotes a concept that normally implies the existence of the concept denoted by the former : see Kleiber (2001). We first evoke the referential properties of these two kinds of anaphora. The properties of the possessive determiner are then discussed in order to explain its occasional incompatibility with meronyms or functionally localized nouns. Finally, we elucidate the consequences for the choice between associative and possessive anaphora upon textual coherence relations, in particular Claim-Evidence (Cornish, 2009a, b) and Explanation.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-normandie-univ.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02143804
Contributeur : Mathilde Salles <>
Soumis le : mercredi 29 mai 2019 - 15:51:32
Dernière modification le : lundi 22 juillet 2019 - 10:11:33

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Mathilde Salles. Anaphore associative et anaphore possessive : quelles différences pour les relations de cohérence ?. Revue Romane, John Benjamins Publishing, 2013, 48 (1), pp.51-78. ⟨10.1075/rro.48.1.03sal⟩. ⟨hal-02143804⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

37