Are rights less important for republicans than for liberals? Pettit versus Pettit - Normandie Université Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Contemporary Political Theory Année : 2017

Are rights less important for republicans than for liberals? Pettit versus Pettit

Résumé

It has become a commonplace in neo-republican thinking to claim that if the notion of rights can be allowed a place in republican political theory, it can never achieve the prominence that liberalism allegedly grants it. Philip Pettit’s book, Republicanism, provides several arguments to buttress this thesis. This article aims at examining these arguments in order to show that once properly stated, they must on the contrary be considered as powerful arguments to the effect that republicans take rights very seriously.

Domaines

Philosophie
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-01784030 , version 1 (02-05-2018)

Identifiants

Citer

Christopher Hamel. Are rights less important for republicans than for liberals? Pettit versus Pettit. Contemporary Political Theory, 2017, 16 (4), pp.478-500. ⟨10.1057/s41296-016-0071-1⟩. ⟨hal-01784030⟩
31 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More